UK Visa Applications

Posted by on Oct 28, 2019 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE, LEGAL UPDATES | 0 comments

If you are a national of a country outside the EEA, and not sure whether you need a visa to travel to the UK you can check the Home Office website, the rules do change from time to time and will depend on the purpose of your stay.

https://www.gov.uk/check-uk-visa/y

The way UK Visa applications are now being submitted, processed and considered  has changed this year. Prior to 28th January 2019, applications  from Italy were sent by post and appointments were made at the British Consulate in Rome.

From this year, all UK visa applications are now made exclusively online via the GOV.UK website: https://www.gov.uk/apply-to-come-to-the-uk.

In the country where the applicant is resident, the application will be processed by a TLS Contact Centre. In Italy, TLS Contact Centres have been set up in Rome and Milan where applicants will be required to  present their bundle of original documents for inspection by a UK Visas and Immigration (Home Office) caseworker and have their biometrics taken (fingerprints, photograph and signature).

After an applicant has registered, completed the application online, uploaded supporting evidence, paid the relevant visa fee in full, they will then be required to make an appointment at the TLS Contact Centre in Rome or Milan. Following submission of your application and making an appointment you will be given a GWF reference number, which will allow you to submit further queries and supplementary documentation or track the progress of your application.

Please contact Solicitor Aleksandra Broom if you need assistance in making any UK Visa application online e.g. visitor’s visa, student visa, study visa, work visa, family visa, returning resident visa etc. In addition to submitting applications on behalf of clients, we are able to accompany any applicants to their appointments at the TLS Contact Centre in Rome (Piazza dei Siculli 14, 00185).

We would any advise any applicants to start their UK visa application process at least 3 month before their planned arrival to the UK.

No-deal or new-deal – the effect on applications for Italian citizenship

Posted by on Aug 7, 2019 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE, LEGAL UPDATES | 0 comments

Further to our May article ‘No Deal’ Italian Law Effect on Italian Citizenship Applications, we remind our British citizen clients that if they intend to apply for Italian citizenship it is advisable that they  lodge their application before 31st October.

With new UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson saying in his first speech as Prime Minister that the UK ‘will come out of the EU on 31 October, no ifs or buts’ and ‘we will do a new deal, a better deal’, the currently predicted Brexit date of 31 October seems ever nearer.

According to Law no. 91 of 5 February 1992, a citizen of the European Union who has been residing in Italy for at least four years can apply for Italian citizenship. However, non-EU citizens need to have resided in Italy for ten years before being able to make the same application.

The Italian government in Law No. 22 of 25 March 2019, (converted into Law 41 of 20 May 2019) put forward measures in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal. This states that British citizens can apply for Italian citizenship as EU citizens up to the date the United Kingdom leaves the European Union if they present their request for citizenship by 31 December 2020.

In July 2019, the Italian government published an update to its “preparedness” planning document, entitled: “Prepararsi al recesso senza accordo del Regno Unito dall’Unione Europea – Informazioni sulle conseguenze e sui preparativi allo scenario di una Brexit senza accordo di recesso”,  available at the following link:

http://www.governo.it/sites/governo.it/files/BREXIT.pdf

Effect on Italian citizenship applications

In summary, Brexit has created two scenarios for Italian citizenship applications on the grounds of residence:

  • A British citizen who has been a registered resident at the anagrafe for four years and applies for Italian citizenship before 31 December 2020

This British citizen shall still be considered an EU citizen and therefore will only need to have satisfied four years of legal residence in Italy to qualify for citizenship.

  • A British citizen who has been registered resident at the anagrafe and applies for Italian citizenship after 31 December 2020

This British citizen will no longer be considered an EU citizen and will need to have satisfied ten years of legal residence in Italy to qualify for citizenship. The years spent in Italy prior to Brexit shall be considered. As of 1 January 2021, UK citizens will be subject to the same requirements as non-EU nationals, more commonly known as ‘extracomunitari’ in Italian.

Likely changes to the above:

The above is the current law at the point of writing this article but is most likely subject to change.

Under the new extension to the Article 50 exit process, Britain should leave the EU on or before 31 October 2019. With this in mind, and the uncertainty of whether the Italian government may change the initial deadline of 31 December 2020 to the earlier deadline of 31 October 2019 (or even earlier, which may be a possibility with the recent change of Prime Minister in the UK promising to execute the UK’s exit by this date with a deal) we would advise all clients to apply for Italian citizenship where they have met the requirements, as a matter of urgency.

The current deadline of 31 December 2020 is only applicable if the UK leaves the UK with ‘no deal’ and is not set in stone. With the baton being passed from Theresa May to Boris Johnson, who is charging on his white horse towards the European Parliament in Brussels adamant that he shall be able to leave with a ‘new deal’ there is always the chance that he may just be successful. These may turn out to be empty promises at the beginning of Johnson’s premiership but in the event that he is successful in executing a deal, we would not wish for our British citizen clients eligible for Italian citizenship to suffer as they had not submitted their applications earlier.

If you are interested in applying for Italian citizenship and would like further information please contact Solicitor Aleksandra Broom.

Captain Carola Rackete and the migrant crisis

Posted by on Jul 29, 2019 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE, LEGAL UPDATES | 0 comments

Carola Rackete, a sea captain who works for the German sea rescue organisation ‘Sea Watch’ was arrested on 29th June for docking a migrant ship without authorisation from officials at the port of Lampedusa, and for ramming into and allegedly attempting to sink an Italian Guardia di Finanza patrol boat.

On 12th June, Rackete had taken on board 53 migrants from the Libyan coast.  She rejected the offer to dock at Tripoli as it is deemed unsafe by humanitarian organisations and as such she headed towards Lampedusa in Italy. According to various NGOs and Süddeutsche Zeitung (South German Newspaper), Lampedusa is considered to be the safest port as per maritime law.

On 14th June, Italy officially closed its ports to migrant rescue ships such as Sea Watch 3, following amendments to Legge 113/2018 (Decreto Sicurezza-Bis – Italy’s National Security Law), brought into force by Legge n. 53/2019, until such time as other EU member states had agreed to accept the migrants, who included pregnant women, those who were ill and children. On 28th June Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg and Portugal offered to take the migrants.  Legge n.53/2019 provided for fines of charities to the tune of tens of thousands of euros for bringing migrants to Italy. On the basis of the amended and enforced Decreto Sicurezza-Bis, rescue ships were threatened with fines of up to €50,000 (£44,800) and impounding of the vessel. 

On 29th June Rackete decided to dock Sea Watch 3 in Lampedusa, without prior authority, stating that she did so as she was worried for the safety of her passengers. She was immediately arrested by Italian authorities after docking and the migrants were not allowed to disembark until the other countries offering to provide safe haven provided the Italian government with  ‘numbers, timelines and means’.

Rackete was also accused of attempting to sink an Italian Guardia di Finanza patrol boat that was attempting to intercept her, in breach of  Article 1100 of the Codice della Navigazione – Resistence or violence against a warship, which states:

‘The commander or officer of the ship, who commits acts of resistance or violence against a national warship, is punished with imprisonment from three to ten years. The penalty for those competing in the crime is reduced from one third to half’.

As the amended Decreto Sicurezza-Bis had already received government approval a month previously, Rackete not only faced three to ten years imprisonment but also a potential fine of €50,000 (£44,800) plus the impounding of Sea Watch 3. In her defence she stated:

For days we had been taking turns, even at night, out of fear that someone might throw themselves overboard. And for them, who can’t swim, it means suicide. I feared the worst. There were acts of self-harm(Corriere della Sera) 

The arrest of Carola Rackete was just one example of recent harsh measures to prevent illegal migration and the current political climate of “tough border controls”.  The arrest caused a political divide. Italian Politician Riccardo Magi defended Rackete saying that she made a decision based on the dire condition of her passengers, yet Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte did not even address the matter at the G20 2019 Osaka summit. Germany understandably protested the arrest of their citizen who in Germany is viewed as a humanitarian heroine. Various appeal organisations in Germany and France have raised over 1 million Euros for Rackete’s and Sea Watch’s legal defence. Around the world, the event highlighted the ongoing European migrant crisis and Italy’s strong resistance to take on any more migrants.

On 2nd July Rackete was released from house arrest following a ruling by judge Alessandra Vella at the Court of Agrigento, who held that Rackete had broken no laws and that she had acted humanely to ensure the safety of her passengers who had been at sea for over 2 weeks, and that no act of violence had occurred. Rackete was cleared of any wrongdoing but may yet face possible charges for aiding and abetting illegal immigration.

The response of the Ministero dell’Interno, Matteo Salvini, to Rackete’s release and acquittal was nothing but anger. He threated to strip Judge Alessandra Vella of her title, stating it was a political decision and that: “Italy cannot be the landing spot for anyone deciding to unload human beings.”

In reeality the numbers of migrants reaching Italy has diminished greatly in 2019. Migrants arrivals by sea between January and May numbered 2,160, compared with 15,617 over the same period last year (statistics taken from The Times).

On 12th July it was reported in the press that the European Parliament wants to invite Rackete to Brussels to discuss the migrant problem in Europe further.

As of June 2019, ironically, Sea Watch 3 was the only humanitarian ship cruising off Libya. Do you think Rackete is a humanitarian heroine or a violator of law, whose actions could have made her responsible for illegal immigration, deaths at sea, profits generated by human trafficking and should consequently have been severely punished?

Claims to Italian citizenship through maternal line

Posted by on Jul 6, 2019 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE, LEGAL UPDATES | 0 comments

Descendants of female Italian citizens who left Italy in the late 19th century and the early part of the 20th century have been hampered in their quest for an Italian passport by the 1912 law on Italian citizenship. 

The Italian Law (Legge no. 555 of 1912) provided that an Italian woman would automatically lose her Italian citizenship either on marriage to a foreign national husband or if her Italian husband naturalised, ie took up a new nationality having emigrated from Italy. The Italian wife was deemed to automatically acquire the new nationality of her husband, irrespective of her actual wishes.

There may only have been a possibility for the woman to reacquire Italian nationality (see Article 9 of Law no. 55) (1) if she worked for the Italian state, or (2) after one year if she returned to reside in Italy and renounced her new citizenship, (3) after two years of living in Italy again, or (4) after two years of moving to a new country as long as she did not apply for citizenship of that country.

According to Art. 1 of Law no. 55/1912, a child could only take the nationality of their father (unless he was unknown):

A person is born an Italian citizen where:

  • The Father is Italian
  • The mother is Italian, where the father is unknown or does not hold citizenship of any country, or if the child does not acquire the citizenship of the foreign father according to the law of that country
  • Neither parent hold citizenship are unknown or do not hold citizenship of any country

Abrogation of the 1912 Law after the Italian Constitution 1948

In recent years there have been major developments in the law of Italian citizenship as regards married women, as a result of:

  • the Italian Constitution of 1948,
  • the 1975 Italian Family Reform Law (Legge n. 151/1975) and
  • the 1983 Law on the acquisition and loss of Italian citizenship (Legge n. 123/1983).

These legal developments now have retrospective effect on the automatic naturalisation of a female Italian citizen since 1912. It is now recognised by the Italian courts that a woman did not automatically lose her Italian citizenship at the moment of marriage or her husband’s naturalization, as she did not expressly renounce this herself by her own free will.

This development in the law began with the decision of the Italian Constitutional Court n. 87 of 9th April 1975, which declared that specific articles of the 1912 law were in violation of the Italian Constitution, in that they led a woman to automatically lose her Italian citizenship independent of her wishes on marriage to a foreign national. It was pointed out that in 1912 the woman had been considered as having inferior legal status to a man, which was in contrast with the concept of the 1948 Constitution which for the first time had recognised the equality of the sexes before the law. The 1912 law was therefore deemed to have created an unjustified and irrational disparity of treatment between two spouses, by not requiring any expression of agreement by the wife to lose her Italian citizenship.

Immediately following this 1975 court decision, the 1912 Italian law was amended. A provision confirming that a woman would not in future lose her Italian citizenship, even when her Italian husband acquired a new nationality, was inserted into the 1975 Family Reform Act, Art. 25, which amended the Italian Civil Code, adding Art. 143 ter as follows:

“a wife shall retain her Italian citizenship, in the absence of any express renunciation, even where by the effect of her marriage or the changing of nationality by her husband she assumes the citizenship of a foreign country.”

Article 219 of the new Family Law of 1975 also provided that any woman, who by effect of marriage to a foreign husband, or the acquiring of a new citizenship by her husband, had lost Italian citizenship, could reacquire this (or in effect be recognised as still being Italian citizens) by making a declaration.  All rules in the 1912 Law which were considered incompatible with the Constitution, were therefore considered annulled.

It was subsequently confirmed by the Italian Constitutional Court (decision n. 30 of 1983) that Article 1 (1) of the 1912 law was in violation of the Italian Constitution, in that it did not allow for a child of an Italian wife, who should have been allowed to retained her Italian citizenship even after marriage to a foreign husband, to claim Italian Citizenship via the maternal line.

It therefore became possible at the moment of this court decision in 1983  for any child born after 1st January 1948 of an Italian mother to claim that they had acquired Italian citizenship from her.  This was ratified by new legislation the same year (Legge n. 123 /1983).

Initially this was not recognised as having any retroactive effect to births prior to the date of the Constitution in 1948. The citizenship law n. 91/1992 also confirmed this fact of no retroactive effect on children of previously Italian mothers born prior to 1948.

However, in a landmark decision in 2009 the Court of Cassazione (case no. 4466 of 25/2/2009) ruled that a person applying for Italian citizenship by descent could prove the transmission of Italian citizenship down through the maternal family line even via female ancestors born before 1st January 1948.

This judgement referred to and upheld the principles of the Convention of New York of 1979 against discrimination against women in citizenship matters.

The Cassazione held that citizenship was a “status” which was permanent and was not subject to expiry unless expressly renounced, so should be recognised at any subsequent point in time, even after the coming into force of the 1948 Constitution (and even where the ancestor had since died).

The Civil Court of Rome now accepts and has approved many petitions on these lines. The 2009 decision and later caselaw has not been ratifed yet by legislation (it was actually proposed in the new Immigration and Security Law no.113 of 2018, but then removed from the draft legislation before Parliament approved it).

Until such time as legislation is put in place,  an application must still be made via the Italian civil court in Rome for the recognition of Italian citizenship by ancestors of Italian women born before 1948.

For further information please see the following page on Applying for Italian citizenship by descent or contact Aleksandra Broom and Charlotte Oliver for advice on your particular family history.

 

Freedom of movement to establish a business in the EU

Posted by on May 19, 2019 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE, LEGAL UPDATES | 0 comments

Please follow this link to read the article in Italian

Within TFUE, articles from 49 to 54 refer to the right of establishment recognised to companies and firms, which means the right to move to another member State of UE in order to practice an employment or an activity.

About it, art. 49 TFUE provides as follows: “Within the framework of the provisions set out below, restrictions on the freedom of establishment of nationals of a Member State in the territory of another Member State shall be prohibited. Such prohibition shall also apply to restrictions on the setting-up of agencies, branches or subsidiaries by nationals of any Member State established in the territory of any Member State. Freedom of establishment shall include the right to take up and pursue activities as self-employed persons and to set up and manage undertakings, in particular companies or firms within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 54, under the conditions laid down for its own nationals by the law of the country where such establishment is effected, subject to the provisions of the Chapter relating to capital.”

Art 52 TFUE specifies that particular prescriptions imposed by national laws, constituting restrictions, are admitted only if justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health.

This criterion is fundamental and it applies to all restrictions posed by national legislations to the rights recognised by European law.

Concerning companies, art. 54 TFUE orders that “Companies or firms formed in accordance with the law of a Member State and having their registered office, central administration or principal place of business within the Union shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, be treated in the same way as natural persons who are nationals of Member States. ‘Companies or firms’ means companies or firms constituted under civil or commercial law, including cooperative societies, and other legal persons governed by public or private law, save for those which are non-profit-making.”

Within UE, in order to have access to the right of establishment, companies must have legal entity and especially profit purposes, which means for example consequently the exclusion of associations.

Moreover, it is necessary for companies to have the nationality of a UE member State and to have constituted and matriculated in conformity with legislations where they have statutory headquarters, central administrations or principal domicile.

There are two modalities able to identify the nationality of a company and those are being object of discussion between UE member States: one is the criterion of incorporation, used for example by United Kingdom and the Netherlands the other is the criterion of effective domicile, used for example by France, Italy, Germany and Spain.

Within incorporation criterion, companies acquire nationality of the State where they have matriculated, whereas within effective domicile criterion companies acquires nationality of the State where they have effective activity and headquarters, or administration.

European law did not choose a unique criterion, which means that interpretative conflicts and discussions can surely occur, when individuation of a company’s nationality is necessary.

About those criterions, a sort of preference seems to appear in art. 54 TFUE, where it is provided that the constitution of a company in conformity with national legislations determines recognition of nationality, even if the effective domicile is elsewhere.

In this specific instance, hence, European law seems to favour incorporation criterion.

The principal issue concerning practical application of the right of establishment, after identification of the nationality, is that uniformity between company national laws lack; in particular, it is not possible to transfer its headquarter without first extinguish the company and then re-constitute it.

Despite the existence of various European directives on the subject, lately with UE directive 2017/1132, the issue mentioned above has not yet find a solution.

As consequence and due to the exigence of definition of material application of the right the establishment for companies and its branches, the CJUE have developed an interesting jurisprudence.

For example, the CJUE sentence, widely known as Centros, has evaluated a company matriculated in the United Kingdom, even if its effective activity was in Denmark. The reason was due to the intent of avoid the application of Danish laws, more strict in the field.

In this case, European Judges have decided that the intent of avoid the application of a strictly national legislation did not constitute an abuse of the right of establishment, considering also that the inscription and matriculation made in the United Kingdom was correct and proper.

Avv. Agnese Micozzi

Bibliography

TFUE text

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=IT

Articles on the object

Libertà di stabilimento e restrizioni alle trasformazioni internazionali “in uscita”: il caso Polbud

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/it/sheet/35/diritto-societario

Centros sentence

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61997CJ0212

EU blue card – highly skilled workers visa

Posted by on Apr 5, 2019 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE, LEGAL UPDATES | 0 comments

EU Blue Card:

The EU Blue Card is a work permit that is offered by 25 Member States to highly-qualified non-EU citizens. The permit allows for non-EU citizens who are qualified workers to have the freedom of movement within the European Union.

Apart from being a non-EU citizen, an applicant must also be one of the following: a highly-qualified/skilled worker or a researcher. There are also opportunities for students, vocational trainees and seasonal workers.

As there are various labour shortages in particular sectors within Europe, there is a demand of qualified workers within the following professions:  mathematics, informatics, natural sciences, technology and medicine. The highly-qualified worker will need to demonstrate that they are able to provide an economic service that is scarce in the hosting EU member state, that the business will have a positive effect in the overall economy of the hosting state and that the applicant possesses sufficient financial resources to provide for the operation of the business.  The aforementioned professionals have a higher chance of obtaining the EU Blue Card due to lack of candidates and lower annual income.

The highly skilled professional will have to submit documentary evidence that they have obtained the required knowledge by way of either university degree, work experience as a scientist, academic or other highly-qualified occupation. In case of no university degree, the applicant will have to demonstrate five years equivalent work experience.

A written declaration from the employer will need to be provided as part of the application process, explaining what benefit the applicant will have on their business. Ultimately, the employer is acting as the applicant’s sponsor and without this declaration the application for an EU Blue Card will not be successful.

For applicants making an application for an EU Blue Card in Italy, the employer must present a request, or a communication, proposing a contract to the Sportello Unico per L’immigrazione (Single Desk for Immigration) in the Prefettura of the right province. If the application is successful, the Italian embassy in the applicant’s country of origin will issue a visa to enter Italy. This is known as entry clearance.

There is also a salary threshold that must be met.  For a profession that is in shortage the estimated salary is 37,752 Euro, for university graduates the estimated salary is 46,400 Euro and for jobs where a ‘special interest’ is requested, the estimated salary is lower and therefore it is easier to obtain the EU Blue Card.

After the application has been submitted, the applicant may have to wait for a maximum of 90 days until they receive a decision on their application. A refusal generates an automatic right of appeal, which needs to be exercised within three weeks of the service of the decision.

At Oliver and Partners we can assist you in making an application for an EU Blue Card and obtaining and submitting all relevant documentation.

Decreto Flussi 2019

Posted by on Feb 21, 2019 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE, LEGAL UPDATES | 0 comments

Work Permit Quotas 2019 for non-EU nationals:

Work permit quotas for non-EU nationals in Italy are released at the beginning of each year by way of publication of the Immigration Quota Decree ‘Decreto Flussi’, which allows non-EU nationals who meet the requirements of the decree to obtain a work permit in Italy.

The quotas vary from year to year. In 2018, the quota was 30,850 in relation to non-EU nationals of which 18,000 were seasonal workers. It is highly likely that the quota shall remain the same for 2019. In 2018, 30,850 workers were divided into three groups i.e. non-seasonal workers, seasonal workers and those who were converting existing permits.

Non-Seasonal Workers –Total 3,000 permits:

Foreign nationals who have completed specific educational programs in their home country: 500 permits.

Certain officers and administrators of Italian companies (restrictions apply), plus certain self-employed individuals from the following categories: a) Entrepreneurs (restrictions apply), b) Freelance workers, c) Highly skilled or renowned artists  d) Founders of start-up companies: 2,400 permits.

Foreign nationals resident in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay or Venezuela with Italian ancestry: 100 permits.

Seasonal workers – 18,000 permits:

Seasonal workers in the tourist and agricultural fields who are nationals of the following countries: Albania, Algeria, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia,  former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Gambia, Ghana, India, Ivory Coast, Japan, Kosovo, Mali, Mauritius, Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Senegal, Serbia, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine: 16,000 permits

Conversion of existing permits – 9,850 permits:

Conversion of seasonal permits into standard sponsored work permits: 4,750 permits.

Conversion of study/internship/training permits into subordinate work permits: 3,500 permits.

Conversion of certain long term residence permits (“permesso di soggiorno CE”) issued by another EU member State into subordinate work permits: 800 permits.

Conversion of study/internship/training permits into independent work permits: 700 permits.

Conversion of certain long term residence permits (“permesso di soggiorno CE”) issued by another EU member State into independent work permits: 100 permits *

In a the recent Press Conference ‘Conferenza Stampa’ on 23 January 2019, the Interior Minister stated that some countries who have not been collaborating have will be excluded from this upcoming Decreto Flussi, these will possibly include Pakistan and Bangladesh.

At Question Time on 21 November 2018, Lisa Noja from the Partito Democratico asked what the governments intentions were in relation to  the shortage of family assistance (l’assistenza familiare) staff and in particular to domestic workers and caregivers in Italy. The reponse was the the government priority lies in resolving the unemployment rate in Italy, which currently stands at 3 million.

The General Director of Immigration and Political Integration from the Ministry of Labour, Tatiana Esposito, has recently confirmed that the quota for 2019 is unlikely to change. She has suggested that those who are entering to carry out subordinate work should not exceed 6,000 units.

We are still waiting for the quota allowance to be confirmed from the Uffici di Gabinetto dei Ministri and for the signature of the President of the Consiglio dei Ministri. In the event that no decreto is released, the President of the Consiglio can rely on transitional provisions based on the Decreto Flussi 2018.

*statistics obtained from Ernst and Young

Italian language test for citizenship

Posted by on Dec 13, 2018 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE, LEGAL UPDATES | 0 comments

A new language test for Italian citizenship has recently been added in an amendment to the immigration and citizenship law D.L. n. 91 of 5th February 1992.

Last month  amendment 14.7 of the Decreto Sicurezza was approved in the Camera, confirming the requirement that all those applying for Italian citizenship under Article 5 of the 1992 law (marriage grounds) and Article 9 (residence grounds) must pass an Italian language test to the minimum level of B1 (pre-intermediate).

Article 9 of D.L. n. 91/1992 has now been amended to include Article 9.1, which states:

‘The granting of Italian citizenship pursuant to Articles 5 and 9 is subject to possession by the interested party of an adequate knowledge of Italian, not less than level B1 of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)’.

This is expected to be shown by production of:

un titolo di studio rilasciato da un istituto di istruzione pubblico o paritario riconosciuto dal Ministero dell’istruzione, dell’università e della ricerca e dal Ministero degli affari esteri e della cooperazione internazionale o dal Ministero dell’istruzione, dell’università e della ricerca, ovvero a produrre apposita certificazione rilasciata da un ente certificatore riconosciuto dal Ministero dell’istruzione, dell’università e della ricerca e dal Ministero degli affari esteri e della cooperazione internazionale o dal Ministero dell’istruzione, dell’università e della ricerca.”

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (known in Italian as Quadro Comune Europeo di Rigerimento per le Lingue (QCER)) states that in order for an applicant to have a B1 level of knowledge, he/she should be able to do the following:

  • Can understand the main points of clear standard input on familiar matters regularly encountered in work, school, leisure, etc.
  • Can deal with most situations likely to arise while travelling in an area where the language is spoken.
  • Can produce simple connected text on topics that are familiar or of personal interest.
  • Can describe experiences and events, dreams, hopes and ambitions and briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions and plans.

The following Italian language certificates have been approved by the CEFR: CELI, CILS and PILDA.

The online application has not yet been amended, but there is already an indication on the Ministero dell’Interno portal that applicants from 1st December may be contacted to integrate their documentation.

Decreto Salvini – Legge 113/2018 – changes to law on Italian Citizenship

Posted by on Oct 30, 2018 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE | 0 comments

Changes to Italian Immigration and Citizenship rules (Decreto Salvini) came into force on October 5th 2018 with Decreto Legge 113/2018.

Article 14 of this new law changes the current rules on applications for Italian citizenship. These new rules affect a number of our clients, in particular British citizens hoping to obtain Italian citizenship before the UK leaves the EU in order to safeguard the rights associated with European citizenship. The main changes are the increase in time in which the Home office must make a decision and the increase in the application fee. Although amendments were also proposed to recognise the same rights to women ancestors to have passed Italian citizenship to their descendants, this was removed from the draft and has not been included in the definitive text. It is expected that this will be included in future legislation.

We have prepared an English translation of Article 14 which deals with changes to the rules on applications for Italian citizenship on the grounds of marriage (Art. 5 of the 1992 law) or on grounds of residence in Italy (Art. 9 of the 1992 law).

ENGLISH TRANSLATION

Art. 14
(Provisions for the acquisition and revocation of citizenship)

1 The following modifications are to be made to Law of February 9th 1992, n.91:

a) Article 8, para 2 is revoked

b) Article 9bis, paragraph 2, is amended, the words  «sum of 200 Euro« are replaced with the following «sum of 250 Euro»;

c) At the end of Article 9 bis the following is added:

ADDED TEXT “Article 9-ter  1. The term for definition of proceedings referred to in Arts. 5 and 9 is forty-eight months from the date of presentation of the question. “;

2. The time limit referred to in para 1. above also applies to applications for the recognistion of  Italian citizenship made to the Italian Consulate network or to the Anagrafe of the Comune relating to facts which took place prior to 1948;

d) At the end of Article 10 the following is added:

ADDED TEXT “Art. 10-bis:  1. Italian citizenship which has been acquired pursuant to Arts. 4 para 2, Art. 5 and Art. 9,  is revoked when the foreigner or stateless person to whom it was granted is convicted definitively for any of the criminal offences provided for by article 407, paragraph 2, letter a), n. 4), of the code of criminal procedure, as well as for the crimes referred to in articles 270-ter and 270-quinquies.2, of the Italian criminal code.

The revocation of citizenship is adopted within three years of the conviction of one of the offences mentioned above by decree of the President of the Republic, on the proposal of the Minister of the Interior.

2. The provisions referred to in paragraph 1, lett. b) e) and d)  apply to the conferment procedures of citizenship in progress at the date of entry into force of this decree.

3. To Article 1, para 1 of the Law of 12th January 1991 n. 13 the letter aa) is substituted by the letter “aa) Concession and revocation of Italian citizenship”.

Permanent residence certificate

Posted by on Oct 23, 2018 in IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW UPDATE | 0 comments

Permanent Residence:

Following 5 years of continuous legal residence in Italy, an EU citizen* can apply for permanent residence. This is a certificate issued by the Comune known as the “Attestato di soggiorno permanente“.

The right to obtain the Attestato di soggiorno permanente is provided in the Directive on Free movement (2004/38/CE) and is incorporated into Italian law no. 30 of 2007 (see articles 14- 16).

Art. 14.
Diritto di soggiorno permanente

1. Il cittadino dell’Unione che ha soggiornato legalmente ed in via continuativa per cinque anni nel territorio nazionale ha diritto al soggiorno permanente non subordinato alle condizioni previste dagli articoli 7, 11, 12 e 13.

Unlike obtaining a residence certificate within 3 months of entry into a new member state, the acquisition of permanent residence is not compulsory.  It is an advantage to have this however, for these reasons:

  • Once permanent residence has been obtained, it can only be forfeited if the applicant is absent from the member state where they acquired permanent residence for 2 years as per Article 14 comma 4 of directive 2004/38/CE vo 03/07.
  • Some Comune may ask that residence certificates are up-dated or the holder proves the grounds on which he/she is resident in Italy. In the case of permanent residence this question need no longer be asked.

We do recommend that British citizens currently resident in Italy apply for this certificate as after the UK leaves the EU this may no longer be possible.

An application for the “attestato” is made to the Comune in which the person is currently resident. The applicant needs simply to show a valid ID such as a passport or identity card, as well as the continuity of residence for more than 5 years in Italy. It is not necessary to provide evidence of  the conditions under which he/she was resident (although in practice many Comune do ask for bank statements of payslips or health insurance this is not a legal requirement). The continuity of legal residence could be proved by a “certificato di residenza storica”.

Each Comune should be able to issue EU citizens with advice on how to apply.

See link here to the Comune di Roma: Attestato di soggiorno permanente di cittadino dell’Unione Europea

Continuity of residence shall not be affected by temporary absences not exceeding a total of six months a year, or by absences of a longer duration for compulsory military service or by one absence of a maximum of twelve consecutive months for important reasons such as pregnancy and childbirth, serious illness, study or vocational training, or a posting in another Member State or a third country as per Article 16 of directive 2004/38/CE.

According to Article 15 of directive 2004/38/CE vo 30/07 permanent residence can be acquired even before the completion of 5 years legal residence for various reasons. For example, family members who have legally resided in a member state with the applicant for a continuous period of 5 years can apply for permanent residence also.

*Despite the UK’s decision to invoke Article 50 of the TEU, at the time of writing, the United Kingdom remains a full member of the EU and rights and obligations continue to fully apply in and to the UK.